Comparison of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized, and blinded study


Kaya C., Celebi N. O., Debbag S., Canbay O., Onal O.

MEDICAL GAS RESEARCH, cilt.12, sa.4, ss.146-152, 2022 (ESCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 12 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4103/2045-9912.337996
  • Dergi Adı: MEDICAL GAS RESEARCH
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.146-152
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: ambulatory surgery, anesthesia, cataract, conscious sedation, dexmedetomidine, geriatrics, remifentanil, POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA, INTRAVENOUS SEDATION, OCULOCARDIAC REFLEX, PROPOFOL, ANESTHESIA, PHARMACODYNAMICS, VALIDATION, MIDAZOLAM, DEPTH, PART
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha(2) agonist and remifentanil is a short-acting mu opioid agonist. We aimed to compare the dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions used for conscious sedation in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery in terms of sedation quality, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction. Eighty patients were allocated into two groups as per the administration of dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine group) and remifentanil (remifentanil group) infusion in this randomized, prospective, double-blinded study. In dexmedetomidine group (n = 40), after a loading of 1 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine in 10 minutes, 0.4 mu g/kg/h infusion was administered. In the remifentanil group (n = 40), remifentanil at a dose of 0.05 mu g/kg was administered for 10 minutes, and then 0.05 mu g/kg/min infusion was continued. Observer Assessment Warning/Sedation Scale values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the remifentanil group, although it was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Bispectral Index values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group according to the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The dexmedetomidine group had lower Verbal Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale scores evaluating pain intensity compared with the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The nausea Visual Analogue Scale values evaluating the severity of postoperative nausea in the dexmedetomidine group were lower than those in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The surgeon satisfaction was found to be greater in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the remifentanil group (P = 0.015). In geriatric patients, the targeted sedation and analgesia levels were achieved more easily with dexmedetomidine infusion, without hemodynamic and respiratory side effects, compared to remifentanil infusion.