Significance of serum AMH and antral follicle count discrepancy for the prediction of ovarian stimulation response in Poseidon criteria patients


Hochberg A., Dahan M. H., Yarali H., Vuong L. N., Esteves S. C.

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, cilt.41, sa.3, ss.717-726, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 41 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s10815-024-03050-8
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, ATLA Religion Database, BIOSIS, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.717-726
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Anti-Müllerian hormone, Antral follicle count, Discordancy, Ovarian stimulation, Poor ovarian response, Poseidon criteria
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose: To determine the risk of not being a poor responder in ovarian stimulation (OS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) when ovarian reserve markers are discordant—one falling within Poseidon’s criteria normal range (e.g., anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≥ 1.2 ng/mL or antral follicle count (AFC) ≥ 5), and the other in the poor ovarian reserve range. Methods: A tri-center retrospective cohort study (2015–2017) involving women with discordant AMH and AFC values undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle using conventional OS (cOS, ≥ 150 IU/day of follicle-stimulating hormone). Discordant serum AMH and AFC values were defined according to Poseidon’s criteria (AMH < 1.2 ng/mL and AFC ≥ 5 or AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL and AFC < 5). Poor ovarian response (POR) was < 4 retrieved oocytes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine AMH and AFC cut-offs for non-POR. Logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with non-POR. Results: Out of 8797 patients who underwent assessment with both AMH and AFC, 1172 (13.3%) exhibited discordant values. Of these, 854 (72.9%) had ≥ 4 oocytes retrieved. Within this group, 726 (85.0%) had “low” AMH values, whereas 128 (15.0%) had “low” AFCs. An AFC of 6 had 77% sensitivity and 52% specificity (AUC = 0.700), while AMH of 1.19 ng/mL had 31% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.492) for non-POR. AFC and the use of recombinant gonadotropins were positive predictors of non-POR. Conclusions: When serum AMH is < 1.19 ng/mL, but AFC is ≥ 6, there is a moderate likelihood of a non-POR during stimulation. Conversely, if AFC is < 5 but serum AMH is ≥ 1.19 ng/mL, the chances of non-POR are low. Among patients with discordant markers, AFC emerges as the primary predictor of oocyte yield.