Comparative study of cefixime alone versus intramuscular ceftizoxime followed by cefixime in the treatment of urinary tract infections in children

Gok F., Duzova A., Baskin E., Ozen S., Besbas N., Bakkaloglu A.

JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, vol.13, no.3, pp.277-280, 2001 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 13 Issue: 3
  • Publication Date: 2001
  • Doi Number: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.3.277
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Page Numbers: pp.277-280
  • Hacettepe University Affiliated: Yes


Urinary tract infections (UTI) can cause acute morbidity and may result in severe problems, including hypertension and reduced renal function, Diagnosis of UTI is extremely important since prompt treatment may prevent damage. In the present study we compared the efficacy of oral cefixime to initial intramuscular ceftizoxime followed by cefixime for the treatment of UTI in children. Fifty-four children were studied. They were randomized to receive either oral cefixime 8 mg/kg/day for 10 days or initial intramuscular ceftizoxime (Cefizox) 50 mg/kg twice a day for 2 days followed by oral cefixime for 8 days, Treatment groups were comparable regarding age, sex, clinical, and laboratory findings. Escherichia coli was isolated from 80% of patients. Repeat urine cultures were sterile within 24 hours in all children. Cure rates were comparable in both groups (92% vs 86% at the end of treatment). No serious adverse effects were observed. We concluded that oral cefixime is a safe and effective alternative treatment.