Who leads, who treats, what dose? European paediatric differentiated thyroid carcinoma practice—an European Cooperative Study Group for Paediatric Rare Tumours survey


Kuhlen M., Roganivic J., Naviglio S., Baecklund F., Bello R., Ben-Ami T., ...Daha Fazla

European Journal of Endocrinology, cilt.194, sa.6, ss.756-768, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 194 Sayı: 6
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1093/ejendo/lvag091
  • Dergi Adı: European Journal of Endocrinology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, Chemical Abstracts Core, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.756-768
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: differentiated thyroid carcinoma, European practice, EXPeRT, paediatric, survey
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: To map real-world management of paediatric differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) across Europe and identify targets for harmonization. Design: Cross-sectional, web-based survey of centres providing paediatric DTC care. Setting & Participants: One consolidated response per centre was requested from a clinician overseeing paediatric DTC. The instrument covered centre profile/multidisciplinary tumour (MDT) board organization; staging and guideline use; risk stratification and dynamic response; diagnostics; surgery/lymph node management; radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) policy and activity selection; and thyroid-stimulating hormone targets, follow-up, shared-care/transition. Analyses were descriptive at centre level. Results: Forty-two centres from 18 countries participated in the survey. Response denominators varied by item. Among responding centres, ≈75% were university or academic hospitals, ≈70% used a paediatric age cut-off of ≤18 years, and ≈60% reported having a dedicated MDT board. Staging and guideline use were heterogeneous: centres most often reported mixed or centre-specific guidance, followed by the American Thyroid Association (ATA) 2015 guideline, national guidelines, and the European Thyroid Association (ETA) 2022 guideline. Dynamic response-to-therapy categories were commonly used. For unilateral presumed low-risk disease, hemithyroidectomy was the usual initial surgery in approximately two-thirds to three-quarters of centres, whereas total thyroidectomy was less common. For low-risk patients, RAIT policy were split between de-escalation and risk-adapted use. When administered, RAIT activity was determined using weight-based, dosimetric, or fixed empirical approaches. Country-level patterns suggested clustering around ETA-leaning, ATA-leaning, and national guideline frameworks. Conclusions: Across Europe, centres broadly endorse risk-adapted care but diverge at key decision nodes—extent of surgery, formal risk framework, and RAIT in low-risk disease—reflecting guidance plurality and organizational context. Leveraging existing infrastructures offers pragmatic avenues to reduce unwarranted variation while generating paediatric-specific evidence to refine recommendations.