EXAMINATION OF PEDIATRIC REHABILITATION COURSE CONTENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS AND GRADUATES


Creative Commons License

Bas D. B. O. Z. G. A. N., MUTLU A.

TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, no.3, pp.389-401, 2024 (ESCI) identifier

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the perspectives of students and graduates regarding the pediatric rehabilitation (PFTR) course content of Hali & ccedil; University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation (PTR) undergraduate programme. Methods: The study included 53 students (age: 21.79 +/- 1.19) studying at Hali & ccedil; University PFTR undergraduate programme in 2023-2024 and 76 participants (age: 27.65 +/- 3.37) graduated from the same department. Participants took online survey about the content of the PFTR, the number of semesters, laboratory hours and the way the course was taught. Results: Both groups (undergraduate: 62.26%; graduate: 81%) stated that it would be more appropriate for the PFTR course to be two semesters in the curriculum and that the laboratory hours were not enough (undergraduate: 47.17%; graduate: 89.51%). Cerebral palsy was the subject thought to be allocated the most time in the content of the course (undergraduate: 32.26%; graduate: 72.37%); and the subject that was in the other course contents and thought to be added to PFTR was 'paediatric orthopaedic problems and orthoses' (undergraduate: 35.84%; graduate: 82,89%). In terms of the teaching methods of the course, 'inviting real cases to the course' was reported as the additional opportunity that was thought to contribute the most (undergraduate: 45.28%; graduate: 78.94%). Conclusion: The issue of providing students with practical competence should be addressed comprehensively by investigating factors that will improve the PFTR course content and course structure.