Which comorbidity index is more appropriate for geriatric patients from the frailty perspective?


HAFIZOĞLU M., ODACI CÖMERTOĞLU E., Öztürk Y., KAHYAOĞLU Z., Çavuşoglu Ç., BALCI C., ...Daha Fazla

European Geriatric Medicine, cilt.15, sa.1, ss.115-125, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 15 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s41999-023-00851-5
  • Dergi Adı: European Geriatric Medicine
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.115-125
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Comorbidity indices, Frailty, Older adults, Physical frailty, Psychological frailty, Social frailty
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objectives: This study examined the relationship between comorbidity indices and physical, psychologic and social frailty and 1-year mortality. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 136 community-dwelling older adults. The relationship of 4 comorbidity indices (CIRS-G, ACCI, GIC, ICED) with 3 different frailty scales (FRAIL, CFS, TFI) was examined. Results: The participants’ median age was 72 years (65–90); 62% of the participants were female. Overall, 15.4% of the participants were living with frailty according to the FRAIL scale, 27.9% of them according to the CFS, 58.8% of them according to the TFI, 47.7% of them living with psychological frailty, and 28.6% of them living with social frailty. There were significant and moderate correlations between CIRS-G and FRAIL, CFS and TFI total scores, TFI-Psychological scores and TFI-Social scores (respectively; p < 0.001, r = 0.530; p < 0.001, r = 0.471; p < 0.001, r = 0.535; p < 0.001, r = 0.402; p = 0.016 r = 0.206). AUC for CIRS-G was calculated as 0.716 among comorbidity indices in predicting the presence of frailty according to the FRAIL scale (p = 0.002, 95%CI [0.60–0.82]), 0.765 according to the CFS (p < 0.001, 95%CI [0.66–0.86]), 0.746 according to the TFI (p < 0.001, 95%CI [0.66–0.82]). Conclusion: The CIRS-G index was found to be superior to other indices in predicting the presence of frailty of comorbidity indices, and only GIC scores showed significant results in predicting mortality. However, it would not be the right approach to recommend a single comorbidity index when evaluating older adults.