Effects of sagittal split Ramus osteotomy on condylar position and Ramal orientation in patients with mandibular asymmetry


MERAL S. E., KOÇ O., TOSUN E., TÜZ H. H.

Clinical Oral Investigations, cilt.28, sa.1, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 28 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00784-023-05400-9
  • Dergi Adı: Clinical Oral Investigations
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Asymmetry, Condyle, Mandible, Ramus, Sagittal split Ramus osteotomy, Temporomandibular joint
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy (SSRO) on the alignment of the condyle and orientation of the Ramal segment following surgery in patients operated for the correction of mandibular asymmetry. Methods: A total of 27 patients who underwent SSRO were enrolled in this study, and study groups were defined as asymmetric (study group) and symmetric (control group) using linear measurements from the dental midline based on a three-dimensional coordinate system. Differences on preoperative and postoperative values of anterior (AJS), posterior (PJS) and superior joint spaces (SJS), condylar axial angle (CAA), Sagittal Ramal Angle (SRA), and Coronal Ramal Angles (CRA) of study and control groups were measured and compared. The data was analyzed using the “Wilcoxon signed-ranks test” to identify differences between groups. Results: Differences between preoperative and postoperative values of CRA and SRA of the contralateral group showed statistically significant results with p-values of 0.007 and 0.005, respectively. A statistically significant change in CAA angle was found in the control and deviation groups (p = 0.018 and p = 0.010, respectively). Conclusions: SSRO has inevitable effects on the condylar and ramal orientation. Individuals with asymmetry require particular attention throughout the planning process and beyond. Conjunctive modalities and modifications should be considered and utilized when necessary. Future studies with larger sample sizes, homogenous follow-up periods, and more comprehensive clinical data are needed to substantiate understanding of the response of the condylar segment. Clinical relevance: Orthognathic surgeries inevitably alter the alignment and harmony of temporomandibular structures and may result in change of AJS, PJS, SJS, CAA, SRA, and LRA, which may change the biomechanics of joint and lead to several complications like temporomandibular disorders. Especially in cases with midline asymmetry needs special consideration from planning till the end of the treatment to achieve best results. In severe cases, conjunctive modalities and modifications and other alternatives such as inverted-L osteotomies should be considered.