The effect of mirror therapy on joint movement, pain and functionality in acute upper limb burns


Seyyah M., TOPUZ S.

Burns, cilt.49, sa.6, ss.1432-1438, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 49 Sayı: 6
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.11.002
  • Dergi Adı: Burns
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1432-1438
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Burn, Mirror therapy, Pain, Physiotherapy, QuickDASH
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: Mirror therapy is aimed at developing a normal proprioceptive perception for the area with pain or movement restriction by making use of the person's monitoring of the healthy side movements thanks to the mirror's reflective feature. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of mirror therapy on joint range of motion, pain and functionality in acute upper extremity burn injuries. Methods: Demographic and burn-specific data of individuals with upper extremity burns were recorded. Individuals were divided into two groups. Standard treatment was applied to the first group, and mirror treatment in addition to the standard treatment was applied to the second group for 30 sessions, 5 days a week for 6 weeks. In the standard treatment program, passive, active-assisted and active ROM, strengthening, stretching, resistant and functional exercises were applied. In the mirror therapy group, active exercises were performed on the healthy side by covering the burn area in the mirror box. Before and after the treatment, joint range of motion(ROM) was evaluated with Universal Goniometer, pain intensity was evaluated with Visual Analog Scale and upper extremity functions were evaluated with QuickDASH. Results: A total of 32 (23 Male, 9 Female) individuals between the ages of 18–65 were included. The mean total burn surface area was 12.93 ± 9.80 in the standard treatment and 6.12 ± 2.96 in the mirror treatment. The groups were similar in terms of ROM change (p > 0.05). The pretest/posttest pain scores of both the standard therapy and mirror therapy groups were similar (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of pretest and posttest QuickDASH scores according to the groups (p > 0.05). The difference between the pretest/posttest QuickDASH scores of both Standard treatment and Mirror treatment groups was statistically significant. Conclusion: This study showed that the standard physiotherapy and rehabilitation program applied in the acute period in upper extremity burns and the mirror treatment applied in addition to this program provide similar improvements in joint range of motion and pain.