Research Information System
Nationalities Papers, vol.54, no.3, pp.646-659, 2026 (SSCI, Scopus)
This article examines how issues related to World War I were remembered and represented during the Single Party Era of the Turkish Republic (1923-1945), focusing on the political elite's narrative strategies. The study situates the persistence of a positive perception of Unionism in contemporary Turkey within the historical remembrance shaped by the early Republic's identity politics. Drawing on newspaper analyses from the 1930s and 1940s, the article reveals how narratives surrounding prominent Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) figures - such as Talat, Enver, and Cemal - evolved. Initially, the Kemalist regime distanced itself from the CUP by framing World War I (also referred to the War in this article) as the product of a few Unionist leaders' recklessness while celebrating the War of Independence as the foundation of a new, victorious Turkish identity. However, by the 1930s, publications began to reinterpret and partially rehabilitate the CUP leaders' reputations, emphasizing their dedication to state interests and leadership qualities.