Measurement error revisited: its importance for the analysis of size and shape of birds


PERKTAŞ U. , Gosler A. G.

ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA, vol.45, no.2, pp.161-172, 2010 (Journal Indexed in SCI) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 45 Issue: 2
  • Publication Date: 2010
  • Doi Number: 10.3161/000164510x551309
  • Title of Journal : ACTA ORNITHOLOGICA
  • Page Numbers: pp.161-172

Abstract

Measurement error in morphological characters is an important issue for many ornithological studies (e.g. ecomorphology, quantitative studies of heritability, studies of systematic and geographic variation). The variation in external morphological characters, such as wing and tarsus length, is usually evaluated using multivariate statistical methods such as principal component analysis (PCA). These are often considered better than univariate statistical methods for explaining size and shape variation in bird populations because they reduce the 'dimensionality' of the data - the size of individual measures (wing etc.) are assumed to contain a component reflecting a general character 'size'. However, the effect of measurement error on principal components has not been formally assessed with respect to such data. Here we report three examples in order to assess the importance of measurement error for analyses within and between bird populations. The effect of measurement error on PCA is also discussed in relation to the importance of levels of error in shape components.