JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, cilt.38, sa.2, ss.204-208, 2012 (SCI-Expanded)
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the time-dependent chemical and ultramorphologic effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in young and old dentin. Methods: Sixty-four teeth scheduled for extraction were collected from young (<30 years) and old (>60 years) patients. In 48 teeth, the dentin was reduced to a powder state and treated with EDTA or EDTA + NaOCl for 1 and 10 minutes, respectively. X-ray diffraction analysis was used to determine the changes in the composition of dentin through dissolution of hydroxyapatite (HAp). In the remaining teeth (n = 16), the root canals were prepared, bisected, and subjected to the same time-dependent treatment regimens. The changes in the number and area of dentinal tubules were calculated by image analysis. The data were analyzed statistically by paired t test and one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey honestly significant difference test at P = .05. Results: In both young and old dentin, EDTA significantly decreased the HAp intensity at 1 and 10 minutes, whereas EDTA + NaOCl only decreased that of old dentin at 10 minutes. Pair-wise comparisons revealed that in old dentin, the reduction in HAp intensity after treatment with EDTA and EDTA + NaOCl was significantly greater at 10 minutes than at 1 minute, whereas in young dentin, a significant decrease was only observed in the EDTA/10-minute subgroup. Compared with their 1-minute counterparts, 10-minute treatment with EDTA + NaOCl significantly increased the tubular diameter and tubular area of old dentin. In young dentin, the tubular area and diameter values were not affected by treatment time (P > .05). Conclusions: In young root dentin, 10-minute treatment with EDTA + NaOCl does not significantly alter the chemical and ultramorphologic structure and thus appears to be unnecessary. In old dentin, extended treatment time with EDTA + NaOCl should be avoided owing to excessive demineralization and erosion. In both types of dentin, EDTA was not effective in complete removal of the smear layer. (J Endod 2012;38:204-208)