F-18-DCFBC PET/CT for PSMA-Based Detection and Characterization of Primary Prostate Cancer


Creative Commons License

Rowe S. P. , Gage K. L. , Faraj S. F. , Macura K. J. , Cornish T. C. , Gonzalez-Roibon N., ...Daha Fazla

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, cilt.56, sa.7, ss.1003-1010, 2015 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 56 Konu: 7
  • Basım Tarihi: 2015
  • Doi Numarası: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154336
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1003-1010

Özet

We previously demonstrated the ability to detect metastatic prostate cancer using N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-F-18-fluorobenzyl-L-cysteine (F-18-DCFBC), a low-molecular-weight radiotracer that targets the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA has been shown to be associated with higher Gleason grade and more aggressive disease. An imaging biomarker able to detect clinically significant high-grade primary prostate cancer reliably would address an unmet clinical need by allowing for risk-adapted patient management. Methods: We enrolled 13 patients with primary prostate cancer who were imaged with F-18-DCFBC PET before scheduled prostatectomy, with 12 of these patients also undergoing pelvic prostate MR imaging. Prostate F-18-DCFBC PET was correlated with MR imaging and histologic and immunohistochemical analysis on a prostate-segment (12 regions) and dominant-lesion basis. There were no incidental extraprostatic findings on PET suggestive of metastatic disease. Results: MR imaging was more sensitive than F-18-DCFBC PET for detection of primary prostate cancer on a per-segment (sensitivities of up to 0.17 and 0.39 for PET and MR imaging, respectively) and per-dominant-lesion analysis (sensitivities of 0.46 and 0.92 for PET and MR imaging, respectively). However, F-18-DCFBC PET was more specific than MR imaging by per-segment analysis (specificities of 0.96 and 0.89 for PET and MR imaging for corresponding sensitivity, respectively) and specific for detection of high-grade lesions (Gleason 8 and 9) greater than 1.0 mL in size (4/4 of these patients positive by PET). F-18-DCFBC uptake in tumors was positively correlated with Gleason score (rho = 0.64; PSMA expression, rho = 0.47; and prostate-specific antigen, rho = 0.52). There was significantly lower F-18-DCFBC uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy than primary tumors (median maximum standardized uptake value, 2.2 vs. 3.5; P = 0.004). Conclusion: Although the sensitivity of F-18-DCFBC for primary prostate cancer was less than MR imaging, F-18-DCFBC PET was able to detect the more clinically significant high-grade and larger-volume tumors (Gleason score 8 and 9) with higher specificity than MR imaging. In particular, there was relatively low F-18-DCFBC PET uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy lesions, compared with cancer in the prostate, which may allow for more specific detection of primary prostate cancer by F-18-DCFBC PET. This study demonstrates the utility of PSMA-based PET, which may be used in conjunction with MR imaging to identify clinically significant prostate cancer.