Sensitivity to argument quality: adding Turkish data to the question of cultural variability versus universality

DEMİR VAN SCHEPPİNGEN Y., Hornikx J.

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, cilt.39, sa.2, ss.104-113, 2022 (ESCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 39 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1080/08824096.2022.2045930
  • Dergi Adı: COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, ComAbstracts, Communication & Mass Media Index, EBSCO Education Source, Political Science Complete
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.104-113
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Persuasiveness, argument quality, universality vs, cultural variability, evidence types, Turkey, PERSUASIVENESS, CONSEQUENCES
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Empirical research has shown that high-quality arguments according to criteria from argumentation theory lead to higher claim acceptance than low-quality arguments. However, this relationship was not observed in some cultural settings. This leads to the question whether criteria for high-quality arguments are culturally variable or universal. Therefore, adding to existing research on sensitivity to quality criteria for the argument from authority and the argument from generalization conducted mainly in Western cultural contexts, an experiment was run in Turkey (N = 307). Results showed that Turkish participants were sensitive to the quality of arguments: claim acceptance was higher when high-quality variants were used than when low-quality variants were used. While not neglecting potential cultural variability, these data add to the findings that there might be some level of universality in sensitivity to criteria for argument quality.