Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer with Nano Filled Coat and Varnish.


Creative Commons License

Rajic V. B., Miletic I., Gurgan S., Peros K., Verzak Z., Malcic A. I.

Acta stomatologica Croatica, cilt.52, sa.4, ss.307-313, 2018 (Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 52 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2018
  • Doi Numarası: 10.15644/asc52/4/4
  • Dergi Adı: Acta stomatologica Croatica
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.307-313
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Dental Materials, Fluorides, Glass Ionomer Cements, Nanoparticles, Varnish, CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE, STORAGE CONDITION, CURING METHOD, CEMENT, WATER
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: This in vitro study compares the fluoride release from microlaminated glass ionomer based on glass hybrid technology coated with two different surface coating agents. Materials and Methods: A total of 18 samples were divided into three groups of six samples each: (1) glass ionomer Equia Forte Fil coated with Equia Forte Coat (Equia+EC), (2) glass ionomer Equia Forte Fil coated with GC Fuji Varnish (Equia+VC) and (3) uncoated glass ionomer Equia Forte (EQUIA cont). Fluoride release was measured using an ion-selective electrode (ORION EA 940) after 24 hours, 4 days, 30 days and 64 days. Repeated measures ANOVA, multiple comparisons, Tukey's test and paired t-test were used to test the differences between the groups. Results: The differences between the groups and four time points were statistically significant (ANOVA, p< 0.0001). Cumulative fluoride ion release after 64 days was 66.01 mg/l, 123.54mg/l and 203.22 mg/l for EQUIA+ EC, EQUIA+ VC and EQUIA cont, respectively. All the differences were statistically significant except the difference between EQUIA+ VC and EQUIA cont after 24 hours. Conclusions: The amount of released fluoride was significantly lower in the samples coated with nanofilled surface coating agent compared to the samples coated with varnish and uncoated samples.