Evaluation of clinical practice guideline quality: comparison of two appraisal tools.
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, cilt.32, ss.663-670, 2020 (SCI-Expanded, SSCI, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 32
- Basım Tarihi: 2020
- Doi Numarası: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa129
- Dergi Adı: International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PAIS International, Psycinfo, Sociological abstracts
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.663-670
- Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objective: The tools used for critically appraising the quality of clinical practice guidelines are complex and not suitable for the busy end users. So rapid, effective and simple instruments are more preferred. The aim of this study is to compare two critical appraisal tools: iCAHE as a rapid instrument and AGREE II as a complex instrument on guideline quality assessment.