Evaluation of clinical practice guideline quality: comparison of two appraisal tools.

Koc, Esra; Aksoy, HİLAL; Ayhan Baser, Duygu; Baydar Artantas, Aylin; Kahveci, Rabia; Cihan, Fatma

doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzaa129

Evaluation of clinical practice guideline quality: comparison of two appraisal tools.

Koc E. M., Aksoy H., Ayhan Baser D., Baydar Artantas A., Kahveci R., Cihan F. G.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, cilt.32, ss.663-670, 2020 (SCI-Expanded)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 32
Basım Tarihi: 2020
Doi Numarası: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa129
Dergi Adı: International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, PASCAL, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PAIS International, Psycinfo, Sociological abstracts
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.663-670
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: The tools used for critically appraising the quality of clinical practice guidelines are complex and not suitable for the busy end users. So rapid, effective and simple instruments are more preferred. The aim of this study is to compare two critical appraisal tools: iCAHE as a rapid instrument and AGREE II as a complex instrument on guideline quality assessment.