Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device


Arikan H., MUHTAROĞULLARI M., UZEL S. M., GÜNCÜ M. B., AKTAŞ G., Marshall L. S., ...Daha Fazla

Journal of Dental Sciences, cilt.18, sa.2, ss.808-813, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 18 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.01.012
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Dental Sciences
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.808-813
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Digital dentistry, Digital impression, Fit, Framework, Implant, Intraoral scanner
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

© 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of ChinaBackground/purpose: Digital impressions using intraoral scanners have recently gained popularity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fit of full-arch screw-retained cobalt-chromium frameworks fabricated via two different digital impression methods. Materials and methods: An edentulous resin master model with four dental implants was fabricated. Forty cobalt-chromium superstructures were fabricated and evaluated according to four groups. In Group 1, the superstructures were evaluated using an intraoral scanner to generate digital impressions. Group 2 relied on the help of an auxiliary geometric appliance in generation of digital impressions via intraoral scanner. The traditional method of splinted open-tray conventional impressions was designated for Group 3. Finally, the control group (Group 4) relied on scanning of the master model directly with a laboratory scanner. Vertical marginal discrepancy was evaluated, and data obtained were statistically analyzed. Results: The highest mean vertical marginal gap value (80.86 ± 50.06 μm) was observed for Group 1 and statistically higher than Group 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.05). The lowest mean vertical marginal gap value (41.98 ± 26.33 μm) was measured from Group 4 and statistically similar to Group 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It has been suggested that the use of auxiliary geometric appliances yields increased scanning accuracy. Frameworks fabricated using the traditional splinted open-tray technique were more reliable compared to those frameworks from digital impressions.