Investigation of masticatory muscle thickness and mechanosensitivity of cervical and masticatory muscles in myofascial temporomandibular disorder patients with bruxism: A cross-sectional study


Kılınç H. E., Onan D., Ülger Ö.

Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, cilt.70, ss.1-8, 2024 (SCI-Expanded)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 70
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102919
  • Dergi Adı: Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-8
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: Bruxism is a common problem associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The aim of this study was to compare a patient group with Myofascial TMD and bruxism and a healthy control group in terms of masseter and temporal muscle thickness (clenching and resting), mechanosensitivity of neck and jaw muscles, craniofacial pain, and disability and emotional stress status. Methods: The study included 31 patients with myofascial TMD and bruxism (19 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 29.96 ±8.12 years (range, 18–45 years), and a control group of 31 healthy subjects (19 females, 12 males) with a mean age of 27.58 ±9.39 years years (range, 18–45 years). Masseter and temporal muscle thicknesses were evaluated with a mobile ultrasound device both at rest and when clenching the jaw. The mechanosensitivity values between the upper trapezius, obliquus capitis inferior, masseter and temporal muscles were measured with a digital algometer device. Craniofacial pain and disability level were evaluated with the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Index (CFPDI), and emotional stress levels with the Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14). Results: No difference was determined between the two groups in respect of the clenching and resting ratios of muscle thickness in any muscle (p >0.05). The mechanosensitivity values in all muscles were lower in the myofascial TMD group than in the healthy group (p <0.05). The CFPDI and PSS-14 scores were higher in the myofascial TMD group (p <0.05). There was a moderate positive correlation between CFPDI, PSS-14 and Bruxism Frequency Score (p <0.05). Conclusion: The difference in mechanosensitivity and CFPDI values between the myofascial TMD patients with bruxism and the healthy control group indicates that the problem in this patient group has effects in the craniocervical and cervical regions. In addition, the correlation between CFPDI, PSS-14 and Bruxism Frequency Score in myofascial TMD patients suggests that this problem may be affected by the interaction of different parameters.