Autologous adipose-derived tissue stromal vascular fraction and intralesional epidermal growth factor combined application in patients with diabetic foot


Aydin M., Akyuz S., Yanik H., Yildirim E., Basak A. M., Guven H. E., ...More

JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Publication Date: 2025
  • Doi Number: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0107
  • Journal Name: JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE
  • Hacettepe University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on wound healing of intralesional epidermal growth factor (iEGF) (Heberprot-p; Hasbiotech, Cuba) and autologous adipose-derived tissue stromal vascular fraction (AD-tSVF) applied in the closure of tissue defects. Method: The patients included in the study were separated into three approximately equal groups: Group 1 with iEGF+AD-tSVF applied; Group 2 with iEGF only applied; and Group 3 with conventional wound care products applied. Granulation tissue was taken from the wound bed before the application of iEGF and AD-tSVF and at intervals thereafter for flow cytometry analysis. Results: Group 1 included 11 patients; Group 2 included 10 patients; and Group 3 included 10 patients. The time to re-epithelialisation was determined as 187.60 +/- 68.78 days in Group 3 patients compared with Group 1 (72.27 +/- 10.33 days) and Group 2 (70.50 +/- 18.02 days) (p<0.001). Following the application of iEGF to the wound bed, an increase was observed in M2 macrophage (CD209+), and M1 macrophage (CD38+) levels. The (CD34+) stem cells obtained from the granulation tissue after the application of AD-tSVF were determined to still be statistically significantly increased in the wound bed on the 21st day. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that the application of iEGF and iEGF+AD-tSVF significantly shortened the wound healing period compared with conventional methods. AD-tSVF stands as an effective option, especially in the patient group with halted or delayed wound healing despite the application of iEGF. Moreover, the significant increase (p<0.001) in the level of M2 macrophages (CD209+), M1 macrophages (CD38+) and stem cells (CD34+) provided by this treatment modality showed that it contributed to wound healing at the cellular level.