Comparison of two techniques in gingival recession treatment A randomized one-year clinical follow-up study

Creative Commons License

Evginer M. S., Olgun E., PARLAK H. M., Dolgun A. B., KEÇELİ H. G.

DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, vol.59, no.1, pp.121-130, 2022 (ESCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 59 Issue: 1
  • Publication Date: 2022
  • Doi Number: 10.17219/dmp/137621
  • Journal Indexes: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Page Numbers: pp.121-130
  • Keywords: gingival recession, connective tissue, treatment outcomes, esthetics, patient-reported outcomes, CONNECTIVE-TISSUE GRAFT, CORONALLY POSITIONED FLAP, ROOT COVERAGE, DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY, SEMILUNAR, EFFICACY, REGENERATION
  • Hacettepe University Affiliated: Yes


Background. Gingival recession (GR) is highly prevalent in the general population and represents a significant concern for patients and clinicians. Various surgical techniques have been proposed to treat gingival recession. Well-designed trials with clinician-and patient-based parameters, evaluating the envelope connective tissue graft (E-CTG) and semilunar coronally advanced flap (SCAF) techniques are still needed.