Symptom status, body perception, and risk of anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel: a prospective longitudinal study


Creative Commons License

Ceylan G. G., GÖK METİN Z.

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, cilt.30, sa.3, ss.2069-2079, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 30 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00520-021-06619-6
  • Dergi Adı: SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2069-2079
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Anxiety, Body perception, Breast cancer, Depression, Nursing, Paclitaxel, PERIPHERAL NEUROTOXICITY, DRUG-THERAPY, CHEMOTHERAPY, IMAGE, WOMEN, EXPERIENCES, DISTRESS, QUALITY, IMPACT, SCALE
  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background Paclitaxel regimen which is widely used in clinical treatment causes many negative physical and psychological consequences on women with breast cancer (BC). This longitudinal study firstly aimed to investigate symptom status, body perception changes, and the risk of anxiety and depression in BC patients receiving during paclitaxel regimen. Materials and methods This descriptive and prospective study was conducted with 84 BC patients receiving paclitaxel regimen. "Chemotherapy Symptom Assessment Scale (C-SAS)," "Body Perception Scale (BPS)," and "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)" were applied at five time points (T-1, before the first Paclitaxel infusion; T-2, at the end of first cycle; T-3, at the end of fourth cycle; T-4, at the end of eighth cycle; T-5, at the end of twelfth cycle). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Cochrane Q, and linear mix model regression analysis. Results The frequency of needling and numbness in hands and feet, pain, and skin or nail changes significantly increased in the subsequent assessment points (T-2, T-3, T-4, and T-5) compared to the initial assessment (T-1) (p < 0.05). The mean scores of BPS significantly decreased at T-2, T-4, and T-5 compared to T-1 (F = 8.152, p < 0.001). The mean scores of the anxiety subscale of the HADS scale decreased at the T-3, T-4, and T-5 compared to T-1 (F = 6.865, p < 0.001), and the mean scores of the depression subscale significantly increased at the T-5 compared to T-1 (F = 3.708, p = 0.006). Conclusions The oncology nurse should comprehensively evaluate the patients who scheduled to receive paclitaxel treatment, and provide counseling to the patients during these specific weeks. Better management of the symptoms that increase with the paclitaxel regimen with repeated interviews under the supervision of the nurse will also prevent the deterioration of body perception. In addition, since the risk of depression increases over time in patients receiving paclitaxel, nurses should periodically screen the risk of depression, and timely consult the patients for the appropriate support.