ASKAR, P. Et Al. 2012. A COMPARISON OF PAPER-AND-PENCIL AND COMPUTERIZED FORMS OF LINE ORIENTATION AND ENHANCED CUED RECALL TESTS. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS , vol.110, no.2 , 383-396.

ASKAR, P., ALTUN, A., CANGÖZ, B., CEVIK, V., KAYA, G., & TURKSOY, H., (2012). A COMPARISON OF PAPER-AND-PENCIL AND COMPUTERIZED FORMS OF LINE ORIENTATION AND ENHANCED CUED RECALL TESTS. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS , vol.110, no.2, 383-396.

ASKAR, Petek Et Al. "A COMPARISON OF PAPER-AND-PENCIL AND COMPUTERIZED FORMS OF LINE ORIENTATION AND ENHANCED CUED RECALL TESTS," PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS , vol.110, no.2, 383-396, 2012

ASKAR, Petek Et Al. "A COMPARISON OF PAPER-AND-PENCIL AND COMPUTERIZED FORMS OF LINE ORIENTATION AND ENHANCED CUED RECALL TESTS." PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS , vol.110, no.2, pp.383-396, 2012

ASKAR, P. Et Al. (2012) . "A COMPARISON OF PAPER-AND-PENCIL AND COMPUTERIZED FORMS OF LINE ORIENTATION AND ENHANCED CUED RECALL TESTS." PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS , vol.110, no.2, pp.383-396.

@article{article, author={Petek ASKAR Et Al. }, title={A COMPARISON OF PAPER-AND-PENCIL AND COMPUTERIZED FORMS OF LINE ORIENTATION AND ENHANCED CUED RECALL TESTS}, journal={PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS}, year=2012, pages={383-396} }