L. Sennaroglu Et Al. , "Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss," JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY , vol.116, no.10, pp.804-810, 2002
Sennaroglu, L. Et Al. 2002. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY , vol.116, no.10 , 804-810.
Sennaroglu, L., Saatci, I., Aralasmak, A., Gursel, B., & Turan, E., (2002). Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY , vol.116, no.10, 804-810.
Sennaroglu, L Et Al. "Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss," JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY , vol.116, no.10, 804-810, 2002
Sennaroglu, L Et Al. "Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss." JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY , vol.116, no.10, pp.804-810, 2002
Sennaroglu, L. Et Al. (2002) . "Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss." JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY , vol.116, no.10, pp.804-810.
@article{article, author={L Sennaroglu Et Al. }, title={Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss}, journal={JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY}, year=2002, pages={804-810} }